PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.16%
Negative revenue growth while RGLD stands at 21.46%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-18.53%
Negative gross profit growth while RGLD is at 15.60%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-18.53%
Negative EBIT growth while RGLD is at 9.93%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-18.53%
Negative operating income growth while RGLD is at 9.93%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-20.45%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-18.18%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-18.18%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.07%
Slight or no buybacks while RGLD is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.04%
Slight or no buyback while RGLD is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.70%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
1085.59%
FCF growth above 1.5x RGLD's 139.43%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
198.96%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 83.91%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-24.65%
Negative 3Y CAGR while RGLD stands at 0.45%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
2800.51%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 150.37%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
222.96%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 117.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-39.82%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
1699.31%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 130.64% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
186.89%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 37.63%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-57.64%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
5331.89%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 805.81%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
123.30%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 83.48%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
41.24%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 36.88%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
317.42%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 90.65%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
57.80%
AR growth well above RGLD's 10.23%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.00%
Asset growth above 1.5x RGLD's 0.30%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.92%
BV/share growth above 1.5x RGLD's 0.54%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.02%
Debt shrinking faster vs. RGLD's 0.79%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.79%
SG&A declining or stable vs. RGLD's 57.60%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.