PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.36%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-25.34%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-25.34%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-25.34%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
1057.27%
Positive net income growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1300.00%
Positive EPS growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1300.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
3.48%
Share count expansion well above RGLD's 0.06%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.44%
Slight or no buyback while RGLD is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-8.03%
Dividend reduction while RGLD stands at 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-21.81%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-15.44%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
299.53%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 225.44%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
43.11%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 10.16%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-30.25%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
511.56%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 183.92%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
22.41%
Below 50% of RGLD's 59.18%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-45.18%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
269.19%
Positive 10Y CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-5.47%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-65.73%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
583.10%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of RGLD's 764.47%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
94.31%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with RGLD's 91.28%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
30.33%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of RGLD's 33.73%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.88%
Negative near-term dividend growth while RGLD invests at 90.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
98.06%
AR growth well above RGLD's 2.72%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.64%
Positive asset growth while RGLD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-2.60%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
0.03%
Debt shrinking faster vs. RGLD's 0.81%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.99%
SG&A declining or stable vs. RGLD's 19.17%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.