95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
30.83%
Revenue growth similar to RGLD's 32.49%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
16.30%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x RGLD's 0.86%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
2.77%
EBIT growth below 50% of RGLD's 28.27%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
2.77%
Operating income growth under 50% of RGLD's 28.27%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-76.45%
Negative net income growth while RGLD stands at 133.55%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-75.00%
Negative EPS growth while RGLD is at 133.33%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-75.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while RGLD is at 133.33%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.35%
Share reduction while RGLD is at 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.35%
Reduced diluted shares while RGLD is at 0.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
6.53%
Dividend growth above 1.5x RGLD's 0.08%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
34.00%
OCF growth under 50% of RGLD's 1991.73%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-875.03%
Negative FCF growth while RGLD is at 102.16%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
425.17%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 363.30%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
17.39%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 47.37%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-38.61%
Negative 3Y CAGR while RGLD stands at 20.71%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
697.66%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 8991.23%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-6.31%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD is at 62.51%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-53.81%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD stands at 370.45%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-1205.32%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while RGLD is at 85.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-220.54%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-183.76%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
619.11%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 431.18%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
60.71%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 36.37%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
17.50%
Positive short-term equity growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.65%
Negative near-term dividend growth while RGLD invests at 57.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-43.68%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while RGLD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
12.44%
Positive asset growth while RGLD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-4.09%
We have a declining book value while RGLD shows 0.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
126.58%
Debt growth far above RGLD's 0.40%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.75%
We expand SG&A while RGLD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.