PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.25%
Revenue growth above 1.5x RGLD's 0.69%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
29.46%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x RGLD's 7.80%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
37.40%
EBIT growth below 50% of RGLD's 139.58%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
37.40%
Operating income growth under 50% of RGLD's 139.58%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
47.16%
Net income growth under 50% of RGLD's 130.21%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
40.00%
EPS growth under 50% of RGLD's 130.77%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
40.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of RGLD's 130.77%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
8.38%
Share count expansion well above RGLD's 0.01%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
8.40%
Diluted share count expanding well above RGLD's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.03%
Positive OCF growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
16.51%
Positive FCF growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
122.35%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 308.78%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-11.80%
Negative 5Y CAGR while RGLD stands at 34.48%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
3.37%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 61.59%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
103.41%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 327.19%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-35.46%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-12.92%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD stands at 20.72%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
19.00%
Below 50% of RGLD's 104.51%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-67.05%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-31.11%
Negative 3Y CAGR while RGLD is 87.93%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
304.82%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of RGLD's 391.99%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
59.92%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 29.27%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
22.20%
Positive short-term equity growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
180.39%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 108.79%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
-67.63%
Negative near-term dividend growth while RGLD invests at 13.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
156.53%
Our AR growth while RGLD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.03%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
7.42%
BV/share growth above 1.5x RGLD's 0.19%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-48.50%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.25%
We cut SG&A while RGLD invests at 8.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.