PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-23.42%
Negative revenue growth while RGLD stands at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-18.86%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-23.52%
Negative EBIT growth while RGLD is at 4.26%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-23.52%
Negative operating income growth while RGLD is at 4.26%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
463.45%
Positive net income growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
460.00%
Positive EPS growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
460.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while RGLD stands at 4.34%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-31.36%
Negative OCF growth while RGLD is at 9.02%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-31.00%
Negative FCF growth while RGLD is at 297.62%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
124.38%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 252.09%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-20.60%
Negative 5Y CAGR while RGLD stands at 38.96%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-3.10%
Negative 3Y CAGR while RGLD stands at 84.65%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
100.65%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 394.89%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-41.38%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD is at 44.96%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-15.46%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD stands at 68.94%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
22.82%
Below 50% of RGLD's 153.85%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-66.69%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-37.90%
Negative 3Y CAGR while RGLD is 17.09%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
256.57%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of RGLD's 336.10%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
44.22%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 15.22%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
17.38%
Positive short-term equity growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.26%
Our AR growth while RGLD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.10%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.73%
BV/share growth above 1.5x RGLD's 0.24%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-10.81%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
114.57%
We expand SG&A while RGLD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.