PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-17.85%
Negative revenue growth while RGLD stands at 1.43%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-10.34%
Negative gross profit growth while RGLD is at 5.13%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-14.45%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-14.45%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
149.47%
Positive net income growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
148.39%
Positive EPS growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
148.39%
Positive diluted EPS growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while RGLD stands at 4.17%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-24.07%
Negative OCF growth while RGLD is at 38.28%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-23.82%
Negative FCF growth while RGLD is at 36.93%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
105.28%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 193.28%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
-22.48%
Negative 5Y CAGR while RGLD stands at 55.26%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
27.89%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 55.85%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
91.05%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 327.17%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-39.41%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD is at 52.48%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
17.79%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 57.97%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
23.01%
Positive 10Y CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-59.13%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
15.47%
Positive short-term CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
205.07%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 106.56%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
22.24%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-6.81%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.08%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.80%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.53%
Positive BV/share change while RGLD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-13.90%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.86%
We expand SG&A while RGLD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.