PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.83%
Positive revenue growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
12.55%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x RGLD's 0.23%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-10.38%
Negative EBIT growth while RGLD is at 24.14%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-10.38%
Negative operating income growth while RGLD is at 24.14%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-79.93%
Negative net income growth while RGLD stands at 57.16%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-81.25%
Negative EPS growth while RGLD is at 56.52%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-81.25%
Negative diluted EPS growth while RGLD is at 56.52%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.17%
Share count expansion well above RGLD's 0.03%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.23%
Slight or no buyback while RGLD is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
1.54%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while RGLD cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
0.04%
OCF growth under 50% of RGLD's 31.80%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
126.84%
FCF growth above 1.5x RGLD's 31.69%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
222.40%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to RGLD's 246.61%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
-5.56%
Negative 5Y CAGR while RGLD stands at 83.48%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-11.09%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
210.51%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 4835.73%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-29.99%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD is at 68.16%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-26.27%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD stands at 12.35%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
108.33%
Positive 10Y CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-94.15%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while RGLD is 119.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
103.66%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 55.29%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
254.23%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 115.99%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
23.55%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
12.98%
Positive short-term equity growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.85%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while RGLD stands at 24.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
77.66%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 13.51%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
118.02%
AR growth well above RGLD's 22.12%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.76%
Negative asset growth while RGLD invests at 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-0.46%
We have a declining book value while RGLD shows 0.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-8.44%
We’re deleveraging while RGLD stands at 1.12%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
156.46%
We expand SG&A while RGLD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.