PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.17%
Negative revenue growth while RGLD stands at 4.10%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
0.25%
Gross profit growth under 50% of RGLD's 4.48%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
3.15%
EBIT growth below 50% of RGLD's 9.28%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
3.15%
Operating income growth under 50% of RGLD's 9.28%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
2.06%
Positive net income growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.22%
Share count expansion well above RGLD's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.23%
Slight or no buyback while RGLD is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
3.61%
Dividend growth above 1.5x RGLD's 0.01%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-7.33%
Negative OCF growth while RGLD is at 9.85%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-7.91%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
88.45%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 120.51%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
31.69%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 100.17%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-14.86%
Negative 3Y CAGR while RGLD stands at 14.98%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
42.03%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 314.65%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
16.03%
Below 50% of RGLD's 160.49%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-25.58%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD stands at 11.58%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
16.64%
Below 50% of RGLD's 166.26%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
23.39%
Below 50% of RGLD's 726.29%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
603.37%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 46.47%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
136.18%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 79.75%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
21.55%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
6.29%
Positive short-term equity growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.38%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 26.00%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
47.34%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 15.09%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
17.16%
AR growth well above RGLD's 25.66%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.31%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 0.26%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
2.16%
BV/share growth above 1.5x RGLD's 1.07%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-13.66%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.41%
We expand SG&A while RGLD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.