PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.68%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
0.85%
Positive gross profit growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-6.90%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-6.90%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
11.50%
Net income growth under 50% of RGLD's 27.13%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
14.29%
EPS growth at 50-75% of RGLD's 27.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of RGLD's 27.12%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
0.19%
Share count expansion well above RGLD's 0.02%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.26%
Diluted share count expanding well above RGLD's 0.04%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.53%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-14.16%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
99.48%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of RGLD's 122.00%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
35.84%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 61.81%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
22.28%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 9.54%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
73.19%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 227.69%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
25.11%
Below 50% of RGLD's 106.96%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
19.89%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 40.15%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
51.85%
Below 50% of RGLD's 251.16%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
77.41%
Below 50% of RGLD's 228.30%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
54.11%
Below 50% of RGLD's 143.52%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
123.94%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 21.83%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
9.22%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
6.03%
Positive short-term equity growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
117.08%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 27.05%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
56.86%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 16.46%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
94433.33%
Our AR growth while RGLD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.94%
Asset growth well under 50% of RGLD's 8.49%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
3.22%
BV/share growth above 1.5x RGLD's 1.37%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-10.44%
We’re deleveraging while RGLD stands at 199.98%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.81%
We expand SG&A while RGLD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.