PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.85%
Negative revenue growth while RGLD stands at 7.82%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-8.30%
Negative gross profit growth while RGLD is at 8.84%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-1.75%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-1.75%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
4.90%
Positive net income growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
6.06%
Positive EPS growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
6.06%
Positive diluted EPS growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.09%
Share count expansion well above RGLD's 0.01%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.31%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
25.60%
Dividend growth above 1.5x RGLD's 0.01%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-8.83%
Negative OCF growth while RGLD is at 6.12%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-8.64%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
50.22%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 136.14%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
27.97%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 60.23%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
16.22%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 37.98%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
30.94%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 209.37%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
39.76%
Below 50% of RGLD's 90.37%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
24.07%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of RGLD's 31.63%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
0.37%
Below 50% of RGLD's 174.64%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
183.27%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 293.39%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
212.45%
Below 50% of RGLD's 504.13%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
98.34%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 40.71%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
23.42%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 3.18%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
14.87%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 5.54%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
139.09%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 27.02%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
39.29%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 16.51%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-3.56%
Firm’s AR is declining while RGLD shows 40.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
238799900.00%
We show growth while RGLD is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-2.20%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
2.85%
BV/share growth above 1.5x RGLD's 1.74%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-59.56%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.96%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.