PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.24%
Positive revenue growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.19%
Positive gross profit growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
7.00%
Positive EBIT growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
7.00%
Positive operating income growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
3.04%
Positive net income growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
2.86%
Positive EPS growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
2.86%
Positive diluted EPS growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while RGLD stands at 7.14%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
11.63%
Positive OCF growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-63.01%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
60.86%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 115.69%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
54.95%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to RGLD's 51.44%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
60.21%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 22.48%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
43.28%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 89.03%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
82.95%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 38.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
82.43%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
4.10%
Below 50% of RGLD's 132.01%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
254.38%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 179.29%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
134.22%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to RGLD's 135.03%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
90.98%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 41.37%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
25.60%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 8.45%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
16.45%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to RGLD's 15.78%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while RGLD stands at 171.59%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.20%
Firm’s AR is declining while RGLD shows 12.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-31.41%
Inventory is declining while RGLD stands at 4.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.48%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
1.90%
1.25-1.5x RGLD's 1.47%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-98.25%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.98%
SG&A growth well above RGLD's 2.11%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.