PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.94%
Revenue growth under 50% of RGLD's 17.84%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
3.70%
Gross profit growth under 50% of RGLD's 19.48%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-0.01%
Negative EBIT growth while RGLD is at 20.98%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-0.01%
Negative operating income growth while RGLD is at 20.98%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
2.54%
Net income growth under 50% of RGLD's 51.18%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
2.78%
EPS growth under 50% of RGLD's 51.22%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
2.78%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of RGLD's 51.22%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.13%
Share count expansion well above RGLD's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.13%
Diluted share count expanding well above RGLD's 0.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.78%
Negative OCF growth while RGLD is at 31.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
97.38%
Positive FCF growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
33.15%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 138.38%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
50.97%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 77.25%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
53.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 44.05%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
0.93%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 127.82%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
56.40%
Below 50% of RGLD's 143.85%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
57.62%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to RGLD's 56.37%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
-11.94%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while RGLD is at 216.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
167.29%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 296.79%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
-48.58%
Negative 3Y CAGR while RGLD is 205.37%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
90.57%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 43.43%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
19.17%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 10.96%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
11.80%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 18.07%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
666.81%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 171.84%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
173.48%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 30.20%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
57.86%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 19.86%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
139.98%
Our AR growth while RGLD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-1.95%
Inventory is declining while RGLD stands at 22.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.89%
Positive asset growth while RGLD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.93%
50-75% of RGLD's 2.59%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-4.69%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.08%
SG&A growth well above RGLD's 4.04%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.