95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.44%
Revenue growth of 10.44% while RGLD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
19.36%
Gross profit growth of 19.36% while RGLD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
12.09%
EBIT growth of 12.09% while RGLD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
12.09%
Operating income growth of 12.09% while RGLD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this modest edge can become significant.
-46.04%
Negative net income growth while RGLD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-46.15%
Negative EPS growth while RGLD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-46.15%
Negative diluted EPS growth while RGLD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.13%
Share count expansion well above RGLD's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.05%
Diluted share count expanding well above RGLD's 0.04%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while RGLD stands at 16.68%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
7.81%
Positive OCF growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
251.29%
Positive FCF growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
20.66%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 109.63%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
51.97%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to RGLD's 50.86%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
34.55%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 47.52%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
0.77%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 91.58%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
71.89%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 32.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
75.55%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 30.26%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-16.12%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while RGLD is at 127.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
151.82%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of RGLD's 175.89%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
170.60%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 127.68%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
80.17%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 32.99%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
24.93%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 15.42%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
19.74%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of RGLD's 23.60%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
118.73%
AR growth well above RGLD's 7.08%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-15.06%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.76%
Asset growth above 1.5x RGLD's 1.19%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.46%
75-90% of RGLD's 1.72%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-6.09%
We’re deleveraging while RGLD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.24%
SG&A growth of 38.24% while RGLD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.