95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.14%
Negative revenue growth while RGLD stands at 4.55%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-3.04%
Negative gross profit growth while RGLD is at 12.13%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-1.06%
Negative EBIT growth while RGLD is at 17.15%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1.06%
Negative operating income growth while RGLD is at 17.15%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-32.95%
Negative net income growth while RGLD stands at 13.31%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-32.43%
Negative EPS growth while RGLD is at 12.79%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-32.43%
Negative diluted EPS growth while RGLD is at 12.79%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.07%
Share count expansion well above RGLD's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.08%
Diluted share count expanding well above RGLD's 0.07%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while RGLD stands at 7.14%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-21.46%
Negative OCF growth while RGLD is at 7.55%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-60.38%
Negative FCF growth while RGLD is at 203.19%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-18.34%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while RGLD stands at 127.09%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
5.34%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 46.27%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-16.68%
Negative 3Y CAGR while RGLD stands at 24.73%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-36.08%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD stands at 57.74%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
5.49%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 3.45%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-24.69%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD stands at 8.84%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-34.59%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while RGLD is at 876.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
60.03%
Below 50% of RGLD's 141.39%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
16.20%
Below 50% of RGLD's 65.47%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
65.46%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 16.85%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
35.36%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with RGLD's 32.63%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
28.74%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 24.05%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.98%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-37.75%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.15%
Positive asset growth while RGLD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.34%
75-90% of RGLD's 1.50%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-10.20%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.88%
SG&A declining or stable vs. RGLD's 24.79%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.