PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.55%
Positive revenue growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
29.24%
Positive gross profit growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
37.10%
Positive EBIT growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
37.10%
Positive operating income growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
26.98%
Positive net income growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
28.00%
EPS growth of 28.00% while RGLD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
28.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 28.00% while RGLD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
0.12%
Share count expansion well above RGLD's 0.02%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.09%
Diluted share count expanding well above RGLD's 0.08%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.79%
Positive OCF growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
10.57%
Positive FCF growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
24.38%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 145.33%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
22.08%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to RGLD's 23.38%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
5.86%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 19.92%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
26.57%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 162.67%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
46.48%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 39.52%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
32.07%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 17.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
55.82%
Below 50% of RGLD's 478.80%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-56.49%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while RGLD is 137.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
32.42%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 29.29%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
66.72%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 17.37%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
27.99%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of RGLD's 33.73%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
25.20%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to RGLD's 24.11%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
13.23%
Below 50% of RGLD's 84.94%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
101.95%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 49.94%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
59.08%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 34.05%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-26.61%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-24.39%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-0.37%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.38%
Under 50% of RGLD's 1.45%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
269.36%
We have some new debt while RGLD reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.96%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.