95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.09%
Revenue growth under 50% of RGLD's 11.34%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
6.25%
Gross profit growth under 50% of RGLD's 14.52%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
4.11%
EBIT growth below 50% of RGLD's 16.42%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
4.11%
Operating income growth under 50% of RGLD's 16.42%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
26.42%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 18.51%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
25.93%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 19.51%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
25.93%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 18.70%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
0.05%
Share count expansion well above RGLD's 0.03%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.04%
Diluted share count expanding well above RGLD's 0.04%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-49.72%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
8.76%
OCF growth under 50% of RGLD's 20.38%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
20.73%
FCF growth under 50% of RGLD's 113.63%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
46.83%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 177.79%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
35.78%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 62.69%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
13.77%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 10.93%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
66.91%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 157.69%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
76.04%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of RGLD's 91.22%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
25.43%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 5.03%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
2617.04%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 409.66% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
100.51%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 36.18%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
13.76%
Below 50% of RGLD's 36.91%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
59.30%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 27.33%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
37.47%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with RGLD's 38.30%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
20.03%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to RGLD's 19.34%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
208.45%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 90.31%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
111.38%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 50.99%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
21.38%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 33.46%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
35.90%
AR growth well above RGLD's 31.18%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
100.00%
Inventory growth well above RGLD's 6.57%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.90%
Asset growth above 1.5x RGLD's 1.00%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.34%
50-75% of RGLD's 2.31%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-1.26%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.27%
We expand SG&A while RGLD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.