95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.44%
Revenue growth above 1.5x RGLD's 4.50%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
60.21%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x RGLD's 10.40%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-31.17%
Negative EBIT growth while RGLD is at 13.06%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-33.15%
Negative operating income growth while RGLD is at 12.28%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-43.00%
Negative net income growth while RGLD stands at 11.60%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-44.12%
Negative EPS growth while RGLD is at 11.56%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-44.12%
Negative diluted EPS growth while RGLD is at 11.64%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.25%
Share reduction while RGLD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.01%
Diluted share change of 0.01% while RGLD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
0.19%
Dividend growth above 1.5x RGLD's 0.02%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
25.61%
OCF growth above 1.5x RGLD's 3.22%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
-8.90%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
121.58%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 227.06%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
68.26%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to RGLD's 63.39%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
35.77%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 20.36%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
177.46%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 368.27%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
139.14%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 79.76%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
62.38%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 18.44%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
38.48%
Below 50% of RGLD's 1723.63%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
12.23%
Below 50% of RGLD's 159.25%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-70.02%
Negative 3Y CAGR while RGLD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
63.53%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 31.89%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
34.54%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of RGLD's 40.35%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
15.29%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of RGLD's 20.29%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
235.15%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 90.29%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
103.88%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 51.02%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
21.23%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 33.44%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
-47.47%
Firm’s AR is declining while RGLD shows 7.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.52%
Asset growth well under 50% of RGLD's 2.74%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
0.24%
Under 50% of RGLD's 2.63%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-8.70%
We’re deleveraging while RGLD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.40%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.