PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.97%
Revenue growth of 6.97% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
10.64%
Gross profit growth of 10.64% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
13.90%
Positive EBIT growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
13.42%
Positive operating income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
15.07%
Net income growth at 75-90% of SA's 16.85%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements to catch or surpass competitor performance.
14.29%
EPS growth above 1.5x SA's 9.09%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x SA's 9.09%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.04%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 5.30%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.05%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 5.34%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.01%
Positive OCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-74.72%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
172.48%
10Y CAGR of 172.48% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
100.60%
5Y CAGR of 100.60% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
65.26%
3Y CAGR of 65.26% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
238.06%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
170.21%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 54.15%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
100.04%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
384.37%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of SA's 486.94%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
173.02%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of SA's 297.08%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
95.04%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
53.97%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SA's 88.18%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
40.97%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with SA's 44.19%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
19.77%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 6.74%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
282.43%
Dividend/share CAGR of 282.43% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
76.17%
Dividend/share CAGR of 76.17% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
25.66%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 25.66% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
147.04%
AR growth well above SA's 153.01%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.14%
Similar asset growth to SA's 2.95%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
3.43%
Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
1.99%
Debt growth far above SA's 3.53%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.67%
We cut SG&A while SA invests at 13.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.