PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-75.96%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-75.96%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-97.83%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-97.83%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
182.08%
Net income growth above 1.5x SA's 16.85%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
183.33%
EPS growth above 1.5x SA's 9.09%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
183.33%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x SA's 9.09%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.32%
Positive OCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
28.32%
Positive FCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
6.51%
10Y CAGR of 6.51% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
6.51%
5Y CAGR of 6.51% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
6.51%
3Y CAGR of 6.51% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.03%
Firm’s AR is declining while SA shows 153.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
3.80%
Inventory growth of 3.80% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-2.62%
Negative asset growth while SA invests at 2.95%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-0.62%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
339.85%
SG&A growth well above SA's 13.80%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.