PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.81%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-8.81%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-197.39%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-197.39%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-197.36%
Negative net income growth while SA stands at 36.62%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-198.04%
Negative EPS growth while SA is at 36.71%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-198.04%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SA is at 36.71%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.39%
Negative OCF growth while SA is at 64.19%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-92.39%
Negative FCF growth while SA is at 48.72%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
13.24%
10Y CAGR of 13.24% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
13.24%
5Y CAGR of 13.24% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
8.73%
3Y CAGR of 8.73% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.50%
Our AR growth while SA is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
7.03%
Inventory growth of 7.03% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
3.74%
Asset growth well under 50% of SA's 14.87%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
3.49%
Under 50% of SA's 17.09%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.49%
SG&A growth well above SA's 12.76%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.