PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
34.63%
Revenue growth of 34.63% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
34.63%
Gross profit growth of 34.63% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
315.91%
Positive EBIT growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
315.91%
Positive operating income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
460.42%
Net income growth above 1.5x SA's 3.35%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
-266.00%
Negative EPS growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-266.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4117.61%
Positive OCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
4117.61%
Positive FCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
48.45%
10Y CAGR of 48.45% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
48.45%
5Y CAGR of 48.45% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
-24.46%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.15%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SA's 62.50%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
7.29%
Inventory growth of 7.29% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
13.98%
Similar asset growth to SA's 12.71%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
15.09%
50-75% of SA's 24.60%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.37%
SG&A growth well above SA's 3.11%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.