PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
38.65%
Revenue growth of 38.65% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
38.65%
Gross profit growth of 38.65% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
73.73%
Positive EBIT growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
73.73%
Positive operating income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
58.05%
Positive net income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
63.85%
Positive EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
63.85%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.32%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x SA's 71.26%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
98.32%
FCF growth above 1.5x SA's 16.08%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
82.36%
10Y CAGR of 82.36% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
82.36%
5Y CAGR of 82.36% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
36511827.79%
3Y CAGR of 36511827.79% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-150.28%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA stands at 87.47%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74837.44%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.79%
Our AR growth while SA is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
25.00%
Inventory growth of 25.00% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
13.95%
Asset growth at 75-90% of SA's 18.36%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
15.43%
Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-11.33%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
284.27%
We expand SG&A while SA cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.