95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.14%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-7.47%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-7.96%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-7.96%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-5.12%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.05%
Slight or no buybacks while SA is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
1.31%
Slight or no buyback while SA is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.11%
Negative OCF growth while SA is at 2.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-14.11%
Negative FCF growth while SA is at 23.63%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
46.59%
10Y CAGR of 46.59% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
24.76%
5Y CAGR of 24.76% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
36.40%
3Y CAGR of 36.40% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
216.23%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 73.53%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-45.21%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA stands at 73.53%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
219.86%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 68.16%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
196.05%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 57.18%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
188.63%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 57.18%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
291.55%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 57.18%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.63%
Firm’s AR is declining while SA shows 20.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.08%
Positive asset growth while SA is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.14%
Under 50% of SA's 24.38%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.33%
We cut SG&A while SA invests at 3.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.