PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
47.14%
Revenue growth of 47.14% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
70.16%
Gross profit growth of 70.16% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
78.16%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SA's 19.55%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
78.16%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SA's 19.55%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
96.62%
Net income growth under 50% of SA's 262.21%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
84.21%
EPS growth under 50% of SA's 257.48%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
105.88%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SA's 259.36%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.11%
Positive OCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-3124.58%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
81.04%
10Y CAGR of 81.04% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
36841732.28%
5Y CAGR of 36841732.28% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
59.87%
3Y CAGR of 59.87% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1234.52%
Positive OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
14311.97%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26453.71%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 665.70%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
1590.09%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 507.06%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
672.20%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 84.07%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.16%
Our AR growth while SA is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-28.98%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
117.23%
Asset growth above 1.5x SA's 1.55%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
50.21%
Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.80%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.