PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.51%
Revenue growth of 4.51% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
6.54%
Gross profit growth of 6.54% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
118.24%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SA's 45.41%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
118.24%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SA's 45.41%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
5.52%
Net income growth under 50% of SA's 14.91%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
10.00%
EPS growth at 50-75% of SA's 15.19%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
11.11%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of SA's 15.37%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
0.25%
Share count expansion well above SA's 0.30%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.72%
Diluted share count expanding well above SA's 0.50%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.55%
Positive OCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
5.55%
FCF growth under 50% of SA's 771.67%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
160.64%
10Y CAGR of 160.64% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
144.72%
5Y CAGR of 144.72% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
42.93%
3Y CAGR of 42.93% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2634.32%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 35.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
43040.45%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3534.29%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
405.46%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
766.15%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 244.99%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
921.59%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 151.17%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.74%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
3.88%
Asset growth well under 50% of SA's 19.19%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
3.73%
Under 50% of SA's 19.98%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.28%
We expand SG&A while SA cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.