PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.05%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-4.94%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-8.75%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-8.75%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-8.35%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-9.09%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-10.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.36%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 3.75%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.53%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 3.75%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.87%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-6.87%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
136.57%
10Y CAGR of 136.57% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
101.69%
5Y CAGR of 101.69% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1165.13%
Positive OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
1283.36%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3452.22%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
1028.99%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1193.55%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 771.28%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
1764.59%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 187.28%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.37%
AR growth well above SA's 29.84%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
6.81%
Asset growth well under 50% of SA's 46.79%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
6.28%
Under 50% of SA's 43.35%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.67%
SG&A declining or stable vs. SA's 189.47%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.