PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.28%
Revenue growth of 0.28% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
-82.43%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-95.52%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-95.52%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-362.24%
Negative net income growth while SA stands at 1596.33%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-300.00%
Negative EPS growth while SA is at 1600.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-325.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SA is at 1600.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
16.15%
Share count expansion well above SA's 0.10%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
9.54%
Diluted share count expanding well above SA's 0.12%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.52%
OCF growth under 50% of SA's 43.89%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
1.52%
FCF growth under 50% of SA's 62.55%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
80.95%
10Y CAGR of 80.95% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
-0.77%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
44.83%
3Y CAGR of 44.83% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25090.08%
Positive OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
89.40%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-966.69%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SA is 1689.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-585.45%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA is 1510.66%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1055.47%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 282.72%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
129.36%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to SA's 138.22%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
284.08%
Our AR growth while SA is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.32%
Asset growth well under 50% of SA's 23.41%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-9.40%
We have a declining book value while SA shows 15.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
5.91%
Debt growth of 5.91% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.39%
SG&A growth well above SA's 18.23%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.