95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
68.51%
Revenue growth of 68.51% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
62.95%
Gross profit growth of 62.95% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
82.56%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SA's 20.78%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
82.56%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SA's 20.78%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
82.05%
Net income growth above 1.5x SA's 11.19%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
57.14%
EPS growth above 1.5x SA's 11.70%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
83.33%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x SA's 11.70%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
5.19%
Share count expansion well above SA's 0.35%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
5.38%
Diluted share count expanding well above SA's 0.35%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.55%
Positive OCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-769.02%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
201.56%
10Y CAGR of 201.56% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.40%
3Y CAGR of 17.40% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.53%
Positive OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
12.86%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
261.32%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
4.77%
Below 50% of SA's 45.30%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
1398.92%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 367.38%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
-82.05%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SA is at 191.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
87.66%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to SA's 84.48%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.67%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SA's 148.52%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.25%
Asset growth above 1.5x SA's 1.90%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
19.91%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SA's 1.91%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
88.69%
Debt growth of 88.69% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.89%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.