PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.75%
Revenue growth of 5.75% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
14.32%
Gross profit growth of 14.32% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
24.60%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SA's 13.38%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
24.60%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SA's 13.38%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-0.65%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
94.44%
Positive EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
88.89%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.02%
OCF growth under 50% of SA's 118.61%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
12.57%
FCF growth under 50% of SA's 62.47%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
118459836.13%
10Y CAGR of 118459836.13% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
221.54%
5Y CAGR of 221.54% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
104.46%
3Y CAGR of 104.46% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
6300.31%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 278.45%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
379.59%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 220.09%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
143.26%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of SA's 217.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
122932.48%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
363.33%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
176.77%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
215.27%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SA's 290.03%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
86.01%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to SA's 83.61%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.31%
Our AR growth while SA is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.63%
Asset growth above 1.5x SA's 1.38%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
5.84%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SA's 0.27%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-6.66%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.35%
We cut SG&A while SA invests at 33.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.