PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.60%
Revenue growth of 3.60% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
-0.21%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
1.18%
Positive EBIT growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1.18%
Positive operating income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
7.19%
Positive net income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
7.89%
Positive EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
7.89%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.06%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 1.52%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-0.02%
Reduced diluted shares while SA is at 2.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
199.89%
Dividend growth of 199.89% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-2.13%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
453.95%
FCF growth above 1.5x SA's 55.11%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
571.98%
10Y CAGR of 571.98% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
174.59%
5Y CAGR of 174.59% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
295.52%
3Y CAGR of 295.52% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
9273.18%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
242.80%
Positive OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
489.03%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
13730.08%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
280.54%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
321.94%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
2138.64%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 901.18%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
158.46%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SA's 190.20%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
128.51%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 90.45%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.87%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.04%
Asset growth well under 50% of SA's 10.13%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
4.81%
50-75% of SA's 7.21%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-8.33%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.24%
We cut SG&A while SA invests at 15.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.