PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.05%
Revenue growth of 4.05% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
4.81%
Gross profit growth of 4.81% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
3.70%
EBIT growth below 50% of SA's 23.97%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
3.70%
Operating income growth under 50% of SA's 23.97%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
1.68%
Net income growth under 50% of SA's 64.00%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
2.44%
EPS growth under 50% of SA's 63.17%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
0.08%
OCF growth under 50% of SA's 129.27%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
0.03%
FCF growth under 50% of SA's 26.64%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
723.13%
10Y CAGR of 723.13% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
182.60%
5Y CAGR of 182.60% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
306.23%
3Y CAGR of 306.23% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
640.28%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 254.52%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
242.27%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 207.38%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
441.69%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 112.58%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
581.35%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
268.71%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
644.65%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
3089.26%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with SA's 2848.13%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
147.25%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SA's 197.12%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
86.70%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to SA's 89.33%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.82%
Our AR growth while SA is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.65%
Asset growth above 1.5x SA's 0.26%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.10%
Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-9.08%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.17%
We expand SG&A while SA cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.