PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-19.93%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-17.34%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-16.55%
Negative EBIT growth while SA is at 39.39%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-16.55%
Negative operating income growth while SA is at 39.39%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-15.36%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-15.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-15.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.05%
Share change of 0.05% while SA is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.12%
Diluted share change of 0.12% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-44.44%
Dividend reduction while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-25.60%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-394.81%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
474.43%
10Y CAGR of 474.43% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
155.90%
5Y CAGR of 155.90% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
104.72%
3Y CAGR of 104.72% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
318.78%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 57.03%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
198.21%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 21.11%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
151.07%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 33.67%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
2734.24%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
292.06%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
215.81%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
3071.55%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 775.39%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
146.06%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 114.03%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
59.98%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SA's 87.30%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.09%
AR growth well above SA's 67.65%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.34%
Negative asset growth while SA invests at 0.22%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
4.54%
Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-11.10%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.05%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.