PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
78.11%
Revenue growth of 78.11% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
56.56%
Gross profit growth of 56.56% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
56.27%
Positive EBIT growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
56.27%
Positive operating income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
48.49%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x SA's 43.63%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
47.06%
EPS growth similar to SA's 43.50%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
47.06%
Similar diluted EPS growth to SA's 45.25%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
0.14%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 1.56%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.13%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 4.84%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-30.00%
Dividend reduction while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
97.45%
Positive OCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
149.53%
FCF growth above 1.5x SA's 17.08%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
747.55%
10Y CAGR of 747.55% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
260.22%
5Y CAGR of 260.22% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
206.39%
3Y CAGR of 206.39% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
10355.24%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
365.07%
Positive OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
245.68%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
9636.81%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
349.98%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
237.90%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
3155.98%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 1016.79%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
150.22%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with SA's 142.15%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
74.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SA's 112.63%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.01%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while SA stands at 39.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.69%
Asset growth well under 50% of SA's 14.37%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
4.28%
Under 50% of SA's 12.40%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-12.48%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.61%
SG&A declining or stable vs. SA's 28.08%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.