PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-28.37%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-23.08%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-19.72%
Negative EBIT growth while SA is at 22.10%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-19.72%
Negative operating income growth while SA is at 22.10%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-24.94%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-24.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-26.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-34.81%
Negative OCF growth while SA is at 27.09%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-787.15%
Negative FCF growth while SA is at 36.45%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
565.78%
10Y CAGR of 565.78% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
164.81%
5Y CAGR of 164.81% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
131.26%
3Y CAGR of 131.26% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
89499.57%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
215.34%
Positive OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
177.71%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
7607.09%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
200.94%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
188.75%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
3166.37%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 816.62%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
149.57%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 134.42%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
75.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 28.78%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.73%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.97%
Positive asset growth while SA is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.82%
Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
2077.39%
Debt growth of 2077.39% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.73%
We expand SG&A while SA cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.