PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-18.89%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-39.72%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-39.72%
Negative EBIT growth while SA is at 15.94%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-39.72%
Negative operating income growth while SA is at 15.94%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-46.70%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-47.37%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-45.95%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.11%
Share change of 0.11% while SA is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
-0.16%
Reduced diluted shares while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.37%
Negative OCF growth while SA is at 165.66%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
100.02%
FCF growth above 1.5x SA's 33.15%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
300.67%
10Y CAGR of 300.67% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
111.87%
5Y CAGR of 111.87% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
69.77%
3Y CAGR of 69.77% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
1505.06%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 474.81%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
120.11%
Below 50% of SA's 611.24%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
80.71%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of SA's 157.95%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
1009.06%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
92.68%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
29.05%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
2727.43%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 607.47%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
151.50%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 126.52%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
68.17%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 31.57%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.55%
Firm’s AR is declining while SA shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.10%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-0.37%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
4.84%
Debt growth of 4.84% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.62%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.