PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.61%
Revenue growth of 0.61% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
-0.39%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-0.39%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-0.39%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
21.86%
Positive net income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
18.18%
Positive EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
18.18%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.48%
Share count expansion well above SA's 0.79%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.39%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 3.33%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-10.15%
Dividend reduction while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
4.99%
Positive OCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-6.13%
Negative FCF growth while SA is at 23.43%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
238.75%
10Y CAGR of 238.75% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
241.38%
5Y CAGR of 241.38% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
10.52%
3Y CAGR of 10.52% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
110932.14%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
343.50%
Positive OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-1.33%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA stands at 11.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
1134.29%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
242.41%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-24.60%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
3212.75%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 697.71%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
186.70%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 108.43%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
46.96%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 30.40%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.02%
Firm’s AR is declining while SA shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while SA stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.20%
Negative asset growth while SA invests at 4.89%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.91%
Under 50% of SA's 3.71%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-4.02%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.28%
We cut SG&A while SA invests at 24.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.