PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.16%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-18.53%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-18.53%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-18.53%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-20.45%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-18.18%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-18.18%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.07%
Share change of 0.07% while SA is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.04%
Diluted share change of 0.04% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.70%
Negative OCF growth while SA is at 93.43%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
1085.59%
FCF growth above 1.5x SA's 0.88%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
198.96%
5Y CAGR of 198.96% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
-24.65%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
2800.51%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 80.02%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
222.96%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 85.99%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-39.82%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
1699.31%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
186.89%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-57.64%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA is 59.10%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
5331.89%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 533.49%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
123.30%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 103.14%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
41.24%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 10.11%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
317.42%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 317.42% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
57.80%
AR growth of 57.80% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.00%
Positive asset growth while SA is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.92%
Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.02%
Debt growth of 0.02% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.79%
SG&A declining or stable vs. SA's 31.28%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.