PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.36%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-25.34%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-25.34%
Negative EBIT growth while SA is at 3.53%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-25.34%
Negative operating income growth while SA is at 3.53%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
1057.27%
Positive net income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1300.00%
Positive EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1300.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
3.48%
Share count expansion well above SA's 0.73%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.44%
Diluted share count expanding well above SA's 1.11%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-8.03%
Dividend reduction while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-21.81%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-15.44%
Negative FCF growth while SA is at 20.77%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
299.53%
10Y CAGR of 299.53% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
43.11%
5Y CAGR of 43.11% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
-30.25%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
511.56%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
22.41%
Positive OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-45.18%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA stands at 16.14%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
269.19%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-5.47%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-65.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA is 33.79%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
583.10%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 522.05%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
94.31%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with SA's 102.69%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
30.33%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 6.33%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.88%
Negative near-term dividend growth while SA invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
98.06%
AR growth of 98.06% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.64%
Positive asset growth while SA is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-2.60%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
0.03%
Debt growth of 0.03% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.99%
We expand SG&A while SA cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.