PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.03%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
5.03%
Gross profit growth of 5.03% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
5.03%
EBIT growth below 50% of SA's 27.29%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
5.03%
Operating income growth under 50% of SA's 27.29%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-5.02%
Negative net income growth while SA stands at 37.71%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-7.14%
Negative EPS growth while SA is at 38.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-7.14%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SA is at 37.78%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-5.30%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-962.45%
Negative FCF growth while SA is at 43.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
265.57%
10Y CAGR of 265.57% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
40.18%
5Y CAGR of 40.18% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
-37.68%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
679.42%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
42.85%
Positive OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-48.13%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
329.48%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
2.22%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-67.99%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
1148.91%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 488.95%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
129.90%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 26.33%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
52.76%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 6.18%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.08%
Firm’s AR is declining while SA shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.35%
Positive asset growth while SA is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
22.01%
Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-19.88%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.79%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.