PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.80%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-3.19%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-3.19%
Negative EBIT growth while SA is at 14.23%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-3.19%
Negative operating income growth while SA is at 14.23%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-278.54%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-284.62%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-284.62%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.06%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 0.12%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.06%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 0.12%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-51.94%
Dividend reduction while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-8.92%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-8.51%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
250.27%
10Y CAGR of 250.27% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
40.54%
5Y CAGR of 40.54% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
-16.83%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
417.66%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
20.23%
Below 50% of SA's 44.88%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-32.27%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-721.54%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-217.95%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-170.14%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA is 57.26%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
934.73%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 492.50%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
86.95%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 34.25%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
27.75%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 6.38%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.03%
Negative near-term dividend growth while SA invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-16.89%
Firm’s AR is declining while SA shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.73%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.85%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-9.51%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.70%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.