PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.25%
Revenue growth of 13.25% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
29.46%
Gross profit growth of 29.46% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
37.40%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SA's 4.59%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
37.40%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SA's 4.59%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
47.16%
Net income growth above 1.5x SA's 22.51%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
40.00%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x SA's 27.40%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
40.00%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x SA's 27.40%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
8.38%
Share count expansion well above SA's 6.74%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
8.40%
Diluted share count expanding well above SA's 6.74%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.03%
OCF growth at 50-75% of SA's 31.35%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
16.51%
Positive FCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
122.35%
10Y CAGR of 122.35% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
-11.80%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
3.37%
3Y CAGR of 3.37% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
103.41%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 60.65%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-35.46%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-12.92%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
19.00%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-67.05%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SA is 81.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-31.11%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA is 82.82%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
304.82%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with SA's 324.22%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
59.92%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 21.42%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
22.20%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 12.46%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
180.39%
Dividend/share CAGR of 180.39% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-67.63%
Negative near-term dividend growth while SA invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
156.53%
AR growth of 156.53% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.03%
Negative asset growth while SA invests at 12.08%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
7.42%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SA's 3.64%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-48.50%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.25%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.