PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-17.85%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-10.34%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-14.45%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-14.45%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
149.47%
Positive net income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
148.39%
Positive EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
148.39%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-24.07%
Negative OCF growth while SA is at 70.81%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-23.82%
Negative FCF growth while SA is at 43.80%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
105.28%
10Y CAGR of 105.28% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
-22.48%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
27.89%
3Y CAGR of 27.89% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
91.05%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-39.41%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is at 47.19%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
17.79%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SA's 51.84%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
23.01%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-59.13%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
15.47%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
205.07%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 163.69%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
22.24%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 12.48%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-6.81%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SA is at 14.67%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.08%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.80%
Negative asset growth while SA invests at 1.34%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.53%
Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-13.90%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.86%
SG&A growth well above SA's 5.30%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.