PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.54%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-33.72%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-35.05%
Negative EBIT growth while SA is at 17.08%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-35.05%
Negative operating income growth while SA is at 17.08%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-89.31%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-88.89%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-88.89%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.10%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 0.73%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.08%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 0.73%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-47.61%
Dividend reduction while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-19.81%
Negative OCF growth while SA is at 97.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
16.12%
Positive FCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
163.47%
10Y CAGR of 163.47% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
-10.49%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
10.49%
3Y CAGR of 10.49% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
171.76%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 98.83%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-26.75%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-0.73%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA stands at 98.69%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-6.14%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-64.60%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
132.33%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 8.81%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
222.43%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 168.43%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
25.26%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 15.40%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
8.87%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SA's 15.34%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.77%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
86.39%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 86.39% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-84.01%
Firm’s AR is declining while SA shows 71.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.95%
Positive asset growth while SA is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-1.00%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
44.33%
Debt growth of 44.33% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.81%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.