PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.01%
Revenue growth of 18.01% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
42.43%
Gross profit growth of 42.43% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
173.43%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SA's 4.90%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
173.43%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SA's 4.90%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
160.92%
Positive net income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
160.71%
Positive EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
160.71%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.23%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 1.39%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.31%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 1.39%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-48.78%
Dividend reduction while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
30.24%
OCF growth at 50-75% of SA's 54.47%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
30.44%
Positive FCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
124.83%
10Y CAGR of 124.83% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
8.13%
5Y CAGR of 8.13% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
-5.44%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
119.98%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 38.51%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-5.19%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-13.15%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
58.76%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
1255.10%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 31.69%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-9.73%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
121.53%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SA's 146.24%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
15.88%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SA's 21.03%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
3.35%
Below 50% of SA's 13.83%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.92%
Dividend/share CAGR of 45.92% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
66.54%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 66.54% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
156.25%
AR growth well above SA's 24.71%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.29%
Asset growth well under 50% of SA's 5.72%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.52%
Under 50% of SA's 4.33%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-7.47%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.56%
We expand SG&A while SA cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.