PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.68%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
0.85%
Gross profit growth of 0.85% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
-6.90%
Negative EBIT growth while SA is at 12.46%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-6.90%
Negative operating income growth while SA is at 12.46%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
11.50%
Positive net income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
14.29%
Positive EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
14.29%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.19%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 2.67%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.26%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 8.00%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.53%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-14.16%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
99.48%
10Y CAGR of 99.48% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
35.84%
5Y CAGR of 35.84% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
22.28%
3Y CAGR of 22.28% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
73.19%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
25.11%
Positive OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
19.89%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
51.85%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
77.41%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
54.11%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
123.94%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 76.60%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
9.22%
Below 50% of SA's 30.51%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
6.03%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SA's 11.63%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
117.08%
Dividend/share CAGR of 117.08% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
56.86%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.86% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
94433.33%
Our AR growth while SA is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.94%
Asset growth well under 50% of SA's 9.32%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
3.22%
50-75% of SA's 6.25%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-10.44%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.81%
We expand SG&A while SA cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.