PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.85%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-8.30%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-1.75%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-1.75%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
4.90%
Positive net income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
6.06%
Positive EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
6.06%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.09%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 10.95%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-0.31%
Reduced diluted shares while SA is at 5.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
25.60%
Dividend growth of 25.60% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-8.83%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-8.64%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
50.22%
10Y CAGR of 50.22% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
27.97%
5Y CAGR of 27.97% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
16.22%
3Y CAGR of 16.22% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
30.94%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of SA's 53.00%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
39.76%
Positive OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
24.07%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of SA's 44.85%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
0.37%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
183.27%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
212.45%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
98.34%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with SA's 95.03%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
23.42%
Below 50% of SA's 47.39%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
14.87%
Below 50% of SA's 33.62%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
139.09%
Dividend/share CAGR of 139.09% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
39.29%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 39.29% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-3.56%
Firm’s AR is declining while SA shows 9.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
238799900.00%
Inventory growth of 238799900.00% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-2.20%
Negative asset growth while SA invests at 26.21%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
2.85%
Under 50% of SA's 16.67%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-59.56%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.96%
We cut SG&A while SA invests at 458.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.