PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-18.59%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-16.62%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 47.17%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-15.52%
Negative EBIT growth while SA is at 6.75%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-15.52%
Negative operating income growth while SA is at 6.75%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-18.77%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-18.92%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-18.92%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.05%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 1.81%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.11%
Slight or no buyback while SA is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-44.76%
Dividend reduction while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-6.99%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
31.55%
Positive FCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
13.95%
10Y CAGR of 13.95% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
12.85%
5Y CAGR of 12.85% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
42.63%
3Y CAGR of 42.63% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
-5.57%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while SA stands at 103.30%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
21.90%
Positive OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
82.91%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SA's 810.69%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-21.60%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while SA is at 87.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
59.10%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
290.73%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 77.62%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
86.13%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with SA's 88.70%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
18.37%
Below 50% of SA's 53.57%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
14.03%
Below 50% of SA's 44.54%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
323.53%
Dividend/share CAGR of 323.53% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
190.02%
Dividend/share CAGR of 190.02% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
66.46%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 66.46% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-24.73%
Firm’s AR is declining while SA shows 28.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
280.32%
Inventory growth of 280.32% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
1.09%
Asset growth well under 50% of SA's 2.39%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
0.97%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SA's 0.08%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-7.67%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.65%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.