PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.14%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-3.04%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-1.06%
Negative EBIT growth while SA is at 50.65%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1.06%
Negative operating income growth while SA is at 50.65%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-32.95%
Negative net income growth while SA stands at 57.29%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-32.43%
Negative EPS growth while SA is at 58.06%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-32.43%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SA is at 58.06%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.07%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 0.27%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.08%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 0.27%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-21.46%
Negative OCF growth while SA is at 43.75%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-60.38%
Negative FCF growth while SA is at 43.32%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-18.34%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
5.34%
5Y CAGR of 5.34% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
-16.68%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-36.08%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
5.49%
Positive OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-24.69%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-34.59%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
60.03%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 28.29%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
16.20%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
65.46%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with SA's 65.15%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
35.36%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SA's 46.82%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
28.74%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SA's 35.64%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.98%
Firm’s AR is declining while SA shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-37.75%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.15%
Asset growth above 1.5x SA's 0.52%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.34%
Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-10.20%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 7.04%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.88%
We expand SG&A while SA cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.