PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.97%
Revenue growth above 1.5x SAND's 2.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
10.64%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of SAND's 13.91%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
13.90%
EBIT growth 50-75% of SAND's 26.92%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
13.42%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SAND's 8.63%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
15.07%
Net income growth under 50% of SAND's 47.17%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
14.29%
EPS growth under 50% of SAND's 50.56%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SAND's 49.43%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.04%
Slight or no buybacks while SAND is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.05%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SAND's 0.38%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.01%
Positive OCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-74.72%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
172.48%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 34.25%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
100.60%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SAND's 75.49%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
65.26%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
238.06%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 63.68%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
170.21%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 99.34%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
100.04%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
384.37%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 146.30% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
173.02%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 38.45%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
95.04%
Positive short-term CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
53.97%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SAND's 41.62%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
40.97%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SAND's 52.31%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
19.77%
Below 50% of SAND's 50.58%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
282.43%
Dividend/share CAGR of 282.43% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
76.17%
Dividend/share CAGR of 76.17% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
25.66%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while SAND cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
147.04%
AR growth well above SAND's 18.98%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.14%
Asset growth above 1.5x SAND's 0.31%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.43%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SAND's 2.17%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
1.99%
We have some new debt while SAND reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.67%
We cut SG&A while SAND invests at 2.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.