PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.05%
Negative revenue growth while SAND stands at 2.71%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-15.05%
Negative gross profit growth while SAND is at 13.91%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-31.12%
Negative EBIT growth while SAND is at 26.92%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-31.12%
Negative operating income growth while SAND is at 8.63%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-25.48%
Negative net income growth while SAND stands at 47.17%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
171.04%
EPS growth above 1.5x SAND's 50.56%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
171.04%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x SAND's 49.43%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-185.05%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-185.05%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
35.12%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to SAND's 34.25%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
35.12%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SAND's 75.49%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
15.00%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-224.40%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.74%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SAND stands at 41.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-29.74%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SAND is at 52.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-31.50%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SAND is at 50.58%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.53%
AR growth well above SAND's 18.98%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
17.35%
Inventory growth of 17.35% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-13.66%
Negative asset growth while SAND invests at 0.31%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-23.19%
We have a declining book value while SAND shows 2.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-163.74%
We cut SG&A while SAND invests at 2.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.